Opposition to Funding Package

In a bold move on March 6, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly criticized her own party for presenting a package of bills aimed at funding various sectors of the federal government. She voiced strong objections, citing concerns over the bundled nature of the bills, excessive government spending, and provisions such as funding for the Department of Justice.

Securing Federal Funding

Despite her vocal opposition to the funding package, Greene wasted no time in celebrating her success in securing federal funding for seven different projects in Northwest Georgia. Her office proudly announced her achievements, emphasizing her meticulous efforts in identifying and securing funding for these projects.

Earmarks in the Minibus

Among the projects Greene secured funding for were an airport expansion in Floyd County and a water treatment facility in Dade County, totaling over $9.3 million. These projects were included as earmarks in the very minibus bill that Greene had criticized and voted against.

Political Maneuvering

Greene’s actions have drawn criticism from Democratic opponents, who accuse her of employing a tactic known as “vote no, take the dough.” Despite voting against the funding bill, Greene benefits from the earmarks, providing her with ammunition to tout her achievements to constituents.

Dual Approach

By securing funding for local projects while voting against the broader funding bill, Greene manages to maintain a contradictory stance, pleasing both her supporters and critics. This tactic allows her to maintain her ideological stance while also delivering tangible benefits to her constituents.

Similar Actions

Greene is not alone in this strategy, as 40 House Republicans, including Rep. Lauren Boebert, have adopted a similar approach. Boebert, facing significant political challenges in Colorado, also voted against earmarks totaling over $20 million, showcasing the prevalence of this political maneuver.